news, products, community - ammonia21.com is
the industry platform for ammonia cooling and
heating experts worldwide.

News >> Industry News

HFC-23 carbon credits remain the most common in the CDM system

10 August 2012

2 comments | rating:
  Login or Register to vote

[ - ] Text [ + ]

In 2012, 18% of CDM credits will go to 19 HCFC-22 production plants for the voluntary destruction of the HFC-23 by-product, incentivising industry to continue to produce HCFC-22, a powerful global warming gas with ozone depletion potential, despite decreasing demand. In contrast 12 % of credits will go to wind power plants and 0.2% to solar projects for the carbon dioxide emissions avoided. 
Since 2005 19 HCFC-22 production plants, mostly in China and India, have profited from manufacturing the environmentally harmful coolant HCFC-22. The companies are paid to destroy its waste by-product HFC-23 under the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which awards certified emission reduction (CER) credits to emission reduction projects in developing countries, generating a revenue stream more lucrative than HCFC-22 sales. This has driven plants in the developing world to not only increase the production but also to keep it high.
 
HCFC-22 plants earn $20 million to $40 million a year from HFC-23 destruction
 
Since 2005, 46% of all CDM carbon credits have been awarded to the 19 coolant factories, in Argentina, China, India, Mexico and South Korea, with two Russian plants receiving carbon credits for destroying HFC-23 under a related United Nations program.
 
Destroying the waste gas is cheap and simple, and companies can earn more than 11,000 credits by simply destroying a ton of HFC-23 waste gas because of HFC-23’s high global warming potential (GWP), calculated to be 11,700 CO2eq. These credits, sold on international markets, earn HCFC-22 manufacturers tens of millions of dollars a year. Carbon market consulting firm IDEAcarbon estimates that each plant has earned, on average, $20 million to $40 million a year from simply destroying waste gas.
 
According to United Nations reports the production of HCFC-22 was so driven by carbon credits for HFC-23 destruction that in the first few years more than half of the plants operated only until they had produced the maximum amount of gas eligible for the carbon credit subsidy, then shut down until the next year.
 
UN CER credits cut by two-thirds and EU to disallow HFC-23 credits in ETS
 
The United Nations has recognised the temptation for companies to take advantage of the incentives to produce environmentally harmful refrigerant gases, refusing since 2007 to award carbon credits to any new factories destroying HFC-23. Moreover, last November, it announced that in contract renewals, factories could claim credits for waste gas equivalent only to 1% of their coolant production, down from 3%. 
 
The European Commission has also banned to use emission offset credits from HFC-23 gas destruction projects in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) . The ban means that companies will be able to use these credits for 2012 compliance under the EU ETS until 30 April 2013, but not thereafter.
 
However, even with these adjustments, credits for destroying HFC-23 this year remain the most common type in the United Nations CDM system, and the question remains as to whether without a form of inducement coolant factories will continue to destroy HFC-23.

Comments

Janos Winter

Qplan Co. Ltd
Louis Redshaw, head of environmental markets at Barclays Capital predicts that "Carbon will be the world's biggest commodity market, and it could become the world's biggest market overall.

Maybe it will be the world's biggest cheating market
added 2012-08-11 07:48:12

Alexandra Maratou

Island nations signal end for Kyoto cash cow: (Reuters Point Carbon) - Nations most at risk from rising sea levels told U.N. climate talks in Thailand on Friday 31 August 2012 that they would not support any move to include emissions from destroying HFC-23 in carbon markets being negotiated under a new climate treaty, likely bringing an end to the biggest private-sector cash cow originated through the international negotiations. The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) said they would not support the inclusion of projects that cut emissions of the controversial gas in new markets, saying it was "inappropriate" to regulate emissions of highly potent greenhouse gases this way. "We don't want to see HFC-23 under new market mechanisms. We think we should be careful using markets for cutting those emissions," said Hugh Sealy, a negotiator with Grenada who represents more than 40 low-lying and vulnerable nations at the talks.- see http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/08/31/us-un-climate-idUKBRE87U0RQ20120831 for full article
added 2012-09-04 11:49:35

To ensure the quality of the comments we receive, you need to be a member to post a comment.
Not a member yet? Register now!