TwitterRSSsubscribe | search |
 

News > Policy News

All about the natural refrigerant ammonia (NH3) in cooling & refrigeration: News, Products, Jobs, Events, Knowledge, Forum, B2B Networking.

HFCs could equal 45% of CO2 emissions by 2050 if untapped

flickrRSS
2009-06-23 - ammonia21.com
Delicious Stumble upon submit to reddit newsvine
[ - ] Text [ + ]
Rate:
Results:
In the last 48 hours, the global media sphere and climate specialists have been ringing the alarm as regards a new report published on HFCs’ projected growth and unforeseen impacts on climate change. Ammonia is quoted as an alternative to environmentally-harmful HFCs.
The scientific report, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows that with a business-as-usual model, HFCs’ production and consumption could be responsible for up to 45% of CO2 emissions by 2050. The UN’s swift reaction to the news forebodes opportunity for proven natural refrigerants, such as ammonia systems.

Alarming increase in HFCs negate any global effort to tackle climate change

"Dramatically cutting carbon dioxide emissions (…) is central to delivering a stabilization of the atmosphere as outlined by the assessments of the IPCC. But there are other low hanging fruit in the climate change challenge and this new scientific paper spotlights one of them - HFCs," Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said in reaction to the findings.

The study shows that if business-as-usual models are kept going, HFCs could equal nine gigatonnes equivalent to around 45% of total CO2 emissions by 2050. This amount is far greater than those expected in previously drawn scenarios such as those by SRES and IPCC/TEAP. This is due to increasing demand in developed and developing countries, especially in Asia, for refrigeration, air-conditioning and insulating foam products. The scenario outlined in the study is based on an assumption that no new regulations are adopted to counter the increase in HFCs.

The report includes case studies where HCFCs were replaced by ammonia in cooling systems. It concludes that with lower GWP, ammonia is suitable for systems with small refrigerant charges where a refrigerant leak would not pose flammability or toxicity threats and for industrial installations with large refrigerant charges expertly managed.

International agreement needed to avert worse effects of global warming

Guus Velders from the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the lead author of the study, said that HFCs present a significant threat to the world's efforts to stabilise climate emissions.

With international Copenhagen climate agreement only a few months ahead to regulate emissions of six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and HFCs, international efforts should be put on a concerted and ambitious scheme to avoid a surge in HFCs.

Swift action to freeze and reduce HFCs could buy the world the equivalent of a decade's worth of carbon dioxide emissions according to Steiner. To which Kert Davies, Greenpeace US Research Director, added that technologically and economically market-ready replacements to HFCs are ready for deployment provided adequate incentives are given.

Ozone-friendly substances become climate enemies

The study based its findings on the projected response to regulation of ozone depleting gases under the Montreal Protocol. The scenario is based on current HCFC consumption patterns of replacements of HCFCs by HFCs and GDP growth.

The Parties to the Montreal Protocol agreed to cut production and consumption of HCFCs in developing countries by 35% in 2020 and 67.5% in 2025 whilst developed countries agreed to phase down HCFCs by 75% in 2010 and then 100% by 2020.

As HFCs have until now been used to replace CFCs/HCFCs in most applications, the lack of further regulation would lead to the above-mentioned scenario.




First Name
Last Name
Email
(If you wish to receive notifications of new comments, please enter your email)
Anonymous
(If you check this box, your name and email will be hidden)
Post a comment: (Please do not add any links)
Sorry, wrong CAPTCHA. Please try again.
2009-06-26 01:26:03 - Brent Hoare
On Thursday 25 June the Australian Senate passed the following motion calling on the Government to support the Montreal Protocol amendment proposals. The Government decided not to support the motion, for reasons which remain unclear, but probably include a lack of attention to the issue and their reluctance to being forced to make policy in response to Greens' Senate motions, where they do not have the numbers.

I certainly agree it is very important that people express their disappointment about this to the Australian Government, and call for a review of their position in time to play a positive and proactive role in Geneva, in order to move the world towards a strong decision on HFCs in November at the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.

Brent

Senator MILNE (Tasmania) (9.36 am)—I move:
That the Senate—
(a) acknowledges proposals submitted by the Federated States of Micronesia and Mauritius to amend the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer to regulate and phase-down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with a high global warming potential, and promote the destruction of banks of ozone-depleting substances at the Montreal Protocol Open Ended Working Group meeting to be held in Geneva from 13 July to 18 July 2009;
(b) notes that these proposals will strengthen the protocol to provide fast¬action climate change mitigation several times greater than the emission reductions sought during the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC);
(c) recognises the importance of these and other fast-action mitigation strategies to reduce the threat of crossing tipping points for abrupt, irreversible and catastrophic climate changes – tipping points many leading scientists now warn may be only a few years away; and
(d) calls on the Government to support the proposals from the Federated States of Micronesia and Mauritius, and to recognise the need to work towards an HFC phase-out coordinated between the UNFCCC and the protocol, and to seek amendments that will enable the UNFCCC and the protocol to both play important collaborative roles in the phase-out of HFCs.

Question agreed to.

TasmaniaALP10Senator O’BRIEN (Tasmania) (9.37 am)—I seek leave to make a short statement on the motion.

Leave granted.

Sen KerrySenator O’BRIEN—The government opposes this motion. We recognise that, with the opposition supporting the motion, the numbers will lie with Senator Milne’s motion. We will not call a division but we wanted that recorded.
2009-06-24 05:07:14 - Klaas Visser
I am forwarding this to all our Federal Members of Parliament -including the Prime Minister - and Senators in Canberra and our state of Victoria with an appeal to aggresively phase out new HFC systems by 2020 with a complete phase out by 2030.

I will copy this to a large number of people I know in Australia with the request to pass it to send it also to our parliamentarians and asking their friends to do the same.

Although we have Swine Flu, it does not mean we have to behave like pigs and destroy our own environment and wallow in it, like some chemical companies would have us do if they had their way.

I urge everyone to do the same in your respective countries and states.

It is unlikely, but perhaps this is a case of: "United we stand, divide we fall!"

With best wishes and kind regards

Yours sincerely

Klaas Visser.
2009-06-23 23:01:15 - Stefan Jensen
The Australian Environment Minister Mr. Peter Garrett must now regret his politically motivated decision to remove funding for the Green Cooling Council (GCC) in 2008. This happened at the critical time where the demonstration projects employing natural refrigerants had been completed, but the reports detailing energy performance had yet to be compiled. How these demonstration projects funded by the previous Government perform in practice will now remain out of the public domain for ever. GCC was the only group of Australian refrigeration practitioners who had the foresight to identify the impact of continued growth in HFC consumption on the climate and propose Government action to do something about the problem. This action was prematurely halted by the present Labour Government. Any backlash that Australian participants in the Copenhagen climate negotiations receive as a result of this is very well deserved indeed.













about us
help
© 2009 shecco. All Rights Reserved